[PD] holding keys on patchload to affect object behaviour
Lucas Cordiviola
lucarda27 at hotmail.com
Tue Mar 29 23:40:17 CEST 2016
Sorry Alexander perhaps I didn't understand you.
If -noloadbang is not what you need, I.e to debug something that went wrong, you can do yourself what you describe in your patch. Put a delay in the loadbang. [key] [keyname]
Salutti
Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
From: lucarda27 at hotmail.com
To: porres at gmail.com; pd-list at lists.iem.at
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:21:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [PD] holding keys on patchload to affect object behaviour
Hi,
Not exactly what you describe but perhaps you need it.
pd/doc/1.manual/x3.htm
general flags:
-noloadbang
:)
Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:16:24 -0300
From: porres at gmail.com
To: pd-list at lists.iem.at
Subject: [PD] holding keys on patchload to affect object behaviour
hello, is the a way for Pd to know what keys are being held down when a patch is loading so it changes the behaviour of an object?
for example, to prevent loadbangs to send a bang at load time?
it would have to be something like:
hold down Shift-Command (Mac) or Shift-Ctrl (PC) to disable loadmess firing at patcher load
yes, this is for implementing a clone of [loadmess] object from max, and this is the only discrepancy left...
cheers
_______________________________________________
Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160329/2fa7e5d4/attachment.html>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list