[PD] sanity check on workings of pd~

[Marco Matteo Markidis]

Hi,

me and Matt discussed [pd~] some time ago. The default fifo blocks is 5;
anyway (line 634 of pd.c) [pd~] doesn't check arguments, so you can put
values as you want, like fifo 0 or fifo -1... but it doesn't like :)

Best regards.

Marco

2016-04-06 6:22 GMT+02:00 Matt Barber <brbrofsvl at gmail.com>:

> You can get it down to one block. You can try zero, but it will crash;
> maybe that's a bug (that is, maybe it shouldn't honor the request with an
> attempt).
>
> The default is five blocks of delay, if I remember correctly.
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu> wrote:
>
>> It has a specifiable delay in blocks, minimum 2 I believe.
>>
>> cheers
>> Miller
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 02:52:10AM +0000, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list
>> wrote:
>> > Hi list,Does [pd~] have a one-block delay?
>> > Thanks,Jonathan
>> >
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160406/08edbe15/attachment.html>