[PD] [Scope~] (was Re: can signal inlets that aren't the main inlet have float or message methods?)
Alexandre Torres Porres
porres at gmail.com
Wed Apr 6 23:53:24 CEST 2016
2016-03-30 4:53 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>:
> [Scope~] did solve the nameclash after all, even if you build cyclone as
> a set of single-object-externals and deployed on a case-insensitive
> filesystem.
>
well, we don't need to solve that anymore. And by the way, nowadays also
Scope~ loads as scope~ since - if I'm not mistaken - Pd Extended 0.43
(cyclone version 0.1alpha56), where this change happened.
So, what did this change actually changed? Say someone started using
[scope~] nowadays, may this object not instantiate somewhere with alpha56+
cyclone versions? Why and how?
And what would change if the official name restores to scope~ (with Scope~
being called the way "scope~" is now?
cheers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160406/581d2692/attachment.html>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list