[PD] Good Time Stretching patches/advice?

[S.E.P.]

Hey, thanks for your replies.

@Jaime Oliver I've tried the phase vocoders. They works well, though the
sound does become more artificial the lower the speed is, e.g. more
metallic with a contrabass sound. I really need an infinite stretch though.
If I go ahead and use [I07.phase.vocoder.pd], do I need to modify it so
that it reverses its reading of the array once the end is reached, or so it
cross-fades into a rewind, or is there a better solution?

@michaelnoble I've also tried using [soundtouch~] for time stretching as
demonstrated in its help file, but slowing down the playback and
transposing it up leads to a very grainy, uncharacteristic sound.

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Jaime Oliver <jaime.oliver2 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> phase vocoders, try the example in the help patches.
> best,
> J
>
> On Apr 14, 2016, at 1:32 AM, S.E.P. <
> dreamoftheshoreofanotherworld at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> As I've discussed at the PD patch repo, I'm looking for an optimal Time
> Stretching patch:
> http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/9909/time-stretching-patches-any-recommendations
>
> From the ideas and patches proposed there (I'll refer to the post # to
> avoid attachments), I've found that a simple array based patch with a very
> short sample works well for some patches, e.g. a contrabass (cf. post 17),
> whereas [small_paul1] works better for something more complex, like a
> saxophone multiphonic (cf. post 8 and 18).
>
> Obviously, I'd prefer a unified solution that works for a wide variety of
> samples. Any advice?
>
> Best regards,
> S.E.
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160415/24ae7be5/attachment.html>