[PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.47-0 test 1 released

[Miller Puckette]

Yep, thanks for catching the numbering problem - I've fixed that now.

I'm not sure what to do about mixiung messages and signals in the same inlet -
that migth turn out not to be possible to allow.  I could hack in a "vis"
message inlet in case there are no inlets at all though... will think about
that.

cheers
Miller

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:59:43PM +0200, Pierre Guillot wrote:
> Hi,
> The clone is really great ! I think there is a bug, the two first copies
> seem to have the instance number 0. And if the first inlet in the
> abstraction is a signal inlet, you can't use it to pass message to the
> object (like vis). I think this is because the clone uses the flag
> "CLASS_NOINLET" but perhaps that even if the abstraction doesn't have any
> inlet, the clone object could have a minimum of 1 inlet (just to use the
> visible message).
> Anyway thanks !

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list