[PD] Preferred/best practice for loading external objects
IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Thu May 5 20:32:46 CEST 2016
On 05/04/2016 11:53 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
> I believe it should be just the one. But I'm a scope conservative
> (despite the contradictory evidence that Pd has, in fact, no scoping
> mechanism :)
hmm, so:
for your people at UCSD you would like to have externals installed into
~/pd/extra and ~/pd-0.46-4/extra and ~/pd-0.22/extra depending on which
version of Pd you are running.
for yourself, you would like to have externals NOT be installed into
~/pd/extra.
since these two behaviours are contradictory and cannot be resolved
automatically, the only option is to ask the user every single time they
are going to install a library via deken, at the potential cost ofthem
shouting "but i told you this directory already three times this
morning" at their computers.
fdmsar
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160505/c7547fe4/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list