[PD] [PD-announce] Oops, test3 bad, test4 up now

Jaime Oliver jaime.oliver2 at gmail.com
Fri May 6 06:19:02 CEST 2016

+1 on clear method for delwrite~
I have those forgotten snippets as a feature now and count on them, but it would be good for them to be optional.

> On May 5, 2016, at 11:57 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2016-05-05 23:55 GMT-03:00 Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu <mailto:msp at ucsd.edu>>:
> almost ready to put out 0.47-0 for real :)
> Awesome. I'd still have a couple of minor feature requests that I'd consider fair for this release so I'll insist on them; but I get it if you just wanna release it out for good - or if you have any thoughts against this or other issues, please share.
> First: bringing back the paf~ external. I looked it up in the earlier releases and found the source from where it was last available (around 0.36 I guess). Here it is attached so you don't need to look for it. It kinda bother me that in the pd examples you mention it but it's not there, so if you decide to not bring it back, maybe remove this mention in F13.paf.control - but checking the source, seems like a fine code to go to waste :)
> Second: Add a clear method message to [delwrite~] so it clears its buffer - this would be extremely useful when implementing some feedback reverberators and not that much work on the code.
> Thanks
> Alex
> <paf~.zip>_______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160506/b946cb60/attachment.html>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list