[PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.47-0test2 released
rolfm at dds.nl
rolfm at dds.nl
Sat May 7 10:16:03 CEST 2016
Miller Puckette schreef op 06-05-2016 18:52:
> That's correct behavior. The earlier behavior (in which owning
> patches saved declarations made inside abstractions) was in error.
>
> I believe old patches will still work, but yes, if you re-save an old
> patch using a new version of Pd you'll have to add the appropriate
> "declare"
> object to the owning patch. (This sounds like an inconvenience but is
> an
> improvement since the old behavior wasn't well defined.)
>
>
> cheers
> Miller
>
i can live with that.
have no idea how this line in the file came into existence.
not having the declare object visually in the main patch was actually
misleading.
rolf
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 11:45:12AM +0200, rolfm at dds.nl wrote:
>> this my pd file :
>>
>> #N struct 1011-symarray float x array symbols 1011-sym;
>> #N struct 1011-sym symbol name float on;
>> #N canvas 235 0 1120 645 10;
>> #X declare -path ./abs-pd;
>> #X obj 37 113 fred-links;
>>
>> i open it with Vanilla (latest test version),
>> add a [i], and save.
>>
>> this is the saved file:
>>
>> #N struct 1010-symarray float x array symbols 1010-sym;
>> #N struct 1010-sym symbol name float on;
>> #N canvas 235 50 1120 645 10;
>> #X obj 37 113 fred-links;
>> #X obj 149 59 i;
>>
>> the declare statement has disappeared
>>
>> this doesn't happen with vanilla 46.7
>>
>> rolf
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list