[PD] Can you close source of Pd patches (for commercial development)?
mviljamaa at kapsi.fi
Sat May 7 18:14:49 CEST 2016
I think if Pd was viable for many different users, it would be more attractive.
Commercial software is sometimes better quality than open source / free. Which can lend to better tools being developed for the platform since there’s a commercial incentive.
Wonder e.g. why the Max platform is more popular, even if its commercial. Commerciality isn’t stopping people from using it.
On May 7, 2016, at 12:08 PM, Pagano, Patrick <pat at digitalworlds.ufl.edu <mailto:pat at digitalworlds.ufl.edu>> wrote:
> So like you'd use like years and years and years of open source development for like your own personal gain?
> Patrick Pagano B.S, M.F.A
> Interactive Media & Education
> https://patrickrpagano.wordpress.com/ <https://patrickrpagano.wordpress.com/>
> On May 7, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Matti Viljamaa <mviljamaa at kapsi.fi <mailto:mviljamaa at kapsi.fi>> wrote:
>> I’ve been thinking about the feasibility of leveraging Pd as a development platform for commercial patches. Sort of like some (e.g. Twisted Tools) are using Reaktor for developing commercial-grade plug-ins.
>> But instead of Reaktor I could rather use Pd, because it’s a more open platform.
>> But if the development is for commercial purposes, there would need to be some sort of mechanism for closing the source. Is this possible or something worth looking at?
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-list at lists.iem.at> mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list <https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list