[PD] New version of freeverb~ with alternate output option.
williamahuston at gmail.com
Tue May 10 06:09:34 CEST 2016
Fred Jan, are you the author of Freeverb?
I have built a "ducking reverb". It's a lot of fun to play with.
I basically send note-on, note-off events
and modulate the "wet" parameter, with a large room size.
Eg., a note-on will trigger Wet to go to Attack_Val
(Usually a low Wet setting) in Attack_ms time.
Then a note-off will trigger sending Wet to Release_Val
(Usually a larger Wet setting) in Release_ms time.
The only problem is, the message changes occur
at control-rate, so I'm getting clicking.
My question is, is there any advantage or difference
in doing my Wet/Dry mixing internal to [Freeverb~]?
...as opposed setting freeverb to 0% dry and 100% wet
and mixing externally?
Of course I can get signal-rate mixing by using [line~]
if I do this externally.
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I just completed the upload of an updated version 1.2.2 of freeverb~ to
> puredata.info, and it is available via deken for the usual platforms.
> This version of Freeverb~ has three enhancements:
> - placed the fix_denorm_nan_float() function is the signal path,
> - added an alternate output that is closer to reality (in theory anyway),
> - restyled the help patch and fixed the missing wav file.
> The github repository is at https://github.com/electrickery/pd-freeverb.
> I am looking forward to any comments regarding the alternate output
> Greetings & have fun,
> Fred Jan
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
May you, and all beings
be happy and free from suffering :)
-- ancient Buddhist Prayer (Metta)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list