[PD] [initbang] in Pd.0.47
liamg_uw at hotmail.com
Tue May 10 14:52:07 CEST 2016
This behavior is documented in the help file, so I guess it is intentional.
Another change is that [initbang] now bangs when the patch is opened, whereas before it would only bang when the patch is called as an abstraction. To change this, I've been using another iemguts object, [dollarzero], to call the $0 value of the parent level patch. If it returns a bang, it means there is no parent level patch, and a spigot is closed; if not, it is opened. It works, but it is a bit of a hack, and it would be nice to see the original behavior reinstated.
To: pd-list at lists.iem.at
From: zmoelnig at iem.at
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 12:08:53 +0200
Subject: Re: [PD] [initbang] in Pd.0.47
On 2016-05-10 12:04, Jérôme Abel wrote:
> I notice a "new" behavior of the [initbang] object. When I put directly
> in an abstraction, it sends a bang, but when I put it in a subpatch into
> the same abstraction, it does not.
> Is it the new and fixed behavior ?
i'm not sure whether this is intended behaviour.
Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list