[PD] [initbang] in Pd.0.47

[Miller Puckette]

It's not intentional.. and I can't see why this is happening.

Anyway, I'm sorry to have to ask this, but where can I get eh new initbang?
(Deken doesn't find it, hmm...)  I can't test without it.

thanks
Miller

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:52:07PM +0100, Liam Goodacre wrote:
> This behavior is documented in the help file, so I guess it is intentional.
> 
> Another change is that [initbang] now bangs when the patch is opened, whereas before it would only bang when the patch is called as an abstraction. To change this, I've been using another iemguts object, [dollarzero], to call the $0 value of the parent level patch. If it returns a bang, it means there is no parent level patch, and a spigot is closed; if not, it is opened. It works, but it is a bit of a hack, and it would be nice to see the original behavior reinstated.
> 
> To: pd-list at lists.iem.at
> From: zmoelnig at iem.at
> Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 12:08:53 +0200
> Subject: Re: [PD] [initbang] in Pd.0.47
> 
> On 2016-05-10 12:04, Jérôme Abel wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I notice a "new" behavior of the [initbang] object. When I put directly
> > in an abstraction, it sends a bang, but when I put it in a subpatch into
> > the same abstraction, it does not.
> > 
> > Is it the new and fixed behavior ?
>  
> confirmed.
> i'm not sure whether this is intended behaviour.
>  
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes
>  
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list 		 	   		  

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list