[PD] [initbang] won't bang..

IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue May 24 20:40:58 CEST 2016

On 05/24/2016 08:27 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:18 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
>> On 05/24/2016 04:31 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
>>> I' m just trying out [initbang] downloaded from here
>>> https://git.iem.at/pd/iemguts but it doesn't bang on load of an
>>> abstraction... I'm using it with Pd-0.47-0 on Debian Jessie. The object
>>> compiled fine and is created, but I get no bang... there must be
>> something
>>> I'm missing..
>> maybe this recent thread about [initbang]?
>> https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2016-05/114802.html
> No, that won't do, because in my Pd, [initbang] won't send a bang inside an
> abstraction. Didn't try it in a subpatch, I need it (sort of) for
> abstractions...

the point about that thread was, that if you have an abstraction, and
that abstraction contains a subpatch wherein the [initbang] object
lives, then it won't get triggered.
or put otherwise: the [initbang] object *must* be instantiated on the
top-level of the abstraction.

btw, iemguts in Debian/stretch already has an iemguts that includes a
working [initbang], so there is no need to compile it yourself (if you
are on stretch).


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160524/c61c8375/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list