[PD] [initbang] won't bang..
adrcki at gmail.com
Tue May 24 21:22:23 CEST 2016
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:40 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
> On 05/24/2016 08:27 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:18 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
> >> On 05/24/2016 04:31 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
> >>> I' m just trying out [initbang] downloaded from here
> >>> https://git.iem.at/pd/iemguts but it doesn't bang on load of an
> >>> abstraction... I'm using it with Pd-0.47-0 on Debian Jessie. The object
> >>> compiled fine and is created, but I get no bang... there must be
> >> something
> >>> I'm missing..
> >> maybe this recent thread about [initbang]?
> >> https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2016-05/114802.html
> > No, that won't do, because in my Pd, [initbang] won't send a bang inside
> > abstraction. Didn't try it in a subpatch, I need it (sort of) for
> > abstractions...
> the point about that thread was, that if you have an abstraction, and
> that abstraction contains a subpatch wherein the [initbang] object
> lives, then it won't get triggered.
> or put otherwise: the [initbang] object *must* be instantiated on the
> top-level of the abstraction.
I see, I didn't give it much thought, apparently...
> btw, iemguts in Debian/stretch already has an iemguts that includes a
> working [initbang], so there is no need to compile it yourself (if you
> are on stretch).
Nope, I'm on Jessie, doesn't matter now, I've compiled it..
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list