[PD] Pduino sysex vs. OSC advice (Christof Ressi)

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Thu Jun 2 03:01:14 CEST 2016


> On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:41 PM, pd-list-request at lists.iem.at wrote:
> 
> b) reduce the range of possible values for your data (e.g. 0-127, like MIDI) and reserve the rest for addressing (128-255). If you need a greater resolution for your values, just break them up into several bytes. This way, sending a single 16 bit integer would take 4 bytes (address, bit 14-15, bit 13-7, bit 0-6). 

That’s a great point. Everyone complains about MIDI now (not enough range, etc) but it’s *perfect* for what it was designed to do: send small event data quickly on much older, slower hardware. I little bitmasking and away you go.

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160601/00b02e5e/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list