[PD] deken install user experience

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 2016-06-09 10:33, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> Sorry if I missed this, but what is the point of displaying
> incompatible (wrong arch, wrong platform) Deken packages? What would be
> harmed if they'd be hidden completely? I fail to see the advantage of
> having the possibility of downloading a package of wrong arch/platform.

like: preparing your patch for offline use on multiple archs, which you
currently don't have access to.

or: checking whether the library exists at all, and if I could nag its
osx maintainer to give me w32 binaries.


fgmsdr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160609/204f5c47/attachment.sig>