[PD] biquad and karplus-strong
Alexandre Torres Porres
porres at gmail.com
Thu Jun 16 08:26:54 CEST 2016
2016-06-15 5:09 GMT-03:00 Peter P. <peterparker at fastmail.com>:
> Orm's implementation of the random phase might also be cheaper than
> your two fexpr~ for that part.
it's just "expr~" not "fexpr~" ;)
> You might not have to be conservative with CPU
> usage in your case at all however.
>
nope, and I need to be more intuitive (as this is a didactic material) and
I consider this to be "simpler" - subjective
> It does work and might save cpu compared to fexpr~.
>
biquad~ is surely cheaper than fexpr~ !!!
> In my case I am trying a textbook implementation for now.
>
yep, that's what I was going for in that example, what you think? If you
have more remarks other than efficiency, I'd like to know.
cheers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160616/ecea4968/attachment.html>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list