[PD] biquad and karplus-strong

[Julian Brooks]

Hey Alexandre,

I got sound that I liked really quickly out of your patch.
Surely a good didactic test.

Regards,

Julian

On 16 June 2016 at 07:26, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> 2016-06-15 5:09 GMT-03:00 Peter P. <peterparker at fastmail.com>:
>
>> Orm's implementation of the random phase might also be cheaper than
>> your two fexpr~ for that part.
>
>
> it's just "expr~" not "fexpr~" ;)
>
>
>> You might not have to be conservative with CPU
>> usage in your case at all however.
>>
>
> nope, and I need to be more intuitive (as this is a didactic material) and
> I consider this to be "simpler" - subjective
>
>
>> It does work and might save cpu compared to fexpr~.
>>
>
> biquad~ is surely cheaper than fexpr~ !!!
>
>
>> In my case I am trying a textbook implementation for now.
>>
>
> yep, that's what I was going for in that example, what you think? If you
> have more remarks other than efficiency, I'd like to know.
>
> cheers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160616/c7ec9926/attachment.html>