[PD] w32 Deken package issues.

[Lucas Cordiviola]

the result in a computer-readable form.
Can you describe the protocol?

(there are probably ways to automate the first part usingDependencyWalker of similar, but i don't know them)

I will spend some time trying to automate this with depwalk, because I already have a slower/harder solution.
salutti,Lucarda
Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.

To: pd-list at lists.iem.at
From: zmoelnig at iem.at
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:59:29 +0200
Subject: Re: [PD] w32 Deken package issues.

On 2016-07-13 10:12, Lucas Cordiviola wrote:
> On 2016-07-12 09:41, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> yes. that's the microsoft way to ship dependencies.
> 
> Lets keep Microsoft out of this, this is a Pd and Pd externals issue.
 
no.
we can leave out my rant, but shipping dependencies multiple times *is*
the w32 way, and i do think we should follow that path.
the alternative - installing 3rd party dependencies to %pd%\bin or even
to %System% - is a very good way to break your system.
 
> How we update all w32 Deken pkgs?
 
this probably sounds a bit obvious:
we identify the broken packages, then identify the missing dlls for each.
then we repack the packages with the libraries included, and upload them)
 
i can do the second part (repackaging, re-uploading), if someone wades
through the first part (identification of missing parts) and provides
the result in a computer-readable form.
(there are probably ways to automate the first part using
DependencyWalker of similar, but i don't know them)
 
 
fgmasdr
IOhannes
 

_______________________________________________
Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160713/c83c3e54/attachment-0001.html>