[PD] PdCon16 NYC Calls are open

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

Waiting for September 19th :)

2016-08-22 1:16 GMT-03:00 Jaime <jaime.oliver2 at gmail.com>:

> Hi all,
>
> Anonymity is desirable but clearly not always feasible. No one will be
> disqualified for not being anonymous.
> Just do the best you can to follow the guidelines!
>
> Best,
>
> J
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 21, 2016, at 6:03 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> 2016-08-16 19:06 GMT-03:00 Jaime Oliver <jaime.oliver2 at gmail.com>:
>
>> Dear Warren,
>>
>> The idea is that the pdf document itself is anonymous, as there clearly
>> is some data that asks for biographic information.
>> It is also clear that in some cases it will be inevitable or at least not
>> ideal to make the application anonymous and in these cases we will ask
>> reviewers to be impartial.
>>
>
> So, the paper proposal I'm about to send with collaborators is mostly
> anonymous, but it refers to a github link where my secret idendity (and
> theirs) is revealed. I think the repository is a relevant reference to the
> work to be proposed, and that even if I hide it, some people closely
> related to the community will still know about who's involved... anyway, if
> you feel it should be hidden, I could do it, let me know.
>
> Now, about the artistic proposals, are they supposed to be anonymous too?
> I can see the anonymous issue being important for paper reviewing, if you
> want the event to be more academic, but I don't think I've ever seen an
> event where you need to hide who you are, and sometimes that's not
> possible... so I'm just checking if this is really it.
>
> thanks
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160823/2079d56d/attachment.html>