[PD] bendin bug (?)

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

As long as we're on it, I wonder if the pitch bend messages were always
14bit, cause in max, the bendin object is only 127 (a heritage from mid
80s?)

cheers

2016-09-04 17:44 GMT-03:00 Simon Iten <itensimon at gmail.com>:

> well for me a 14-bit number with a range of 16383 is zero based, otherwise
> I would need an additional bit for the sign.
>
> also nobend=2000H indicates  a value from 0 to 16383...
>
>
>
> Am Sonntag, 4. September 2016 schrieb Giulio Moro via Pd-list :
>
>> The specs don't say much about how to interpret the value actually
>> https://www.midi.org/specifications/item/table-1-summary-of-midi-message
>>
>> "Pitch Bend Change.
>> status: 1110nnnn
>> data: 0lllllll 0mmmmmmm
>>
>> This message is sent to indicate a change in the pitch bender (wheel or
>> lever, typically). The pitch bender is measured by a fourteen bit value.
>> Center (no pitch change) is 2000H. Sensitivity is a function of the
>> transmitter. (llllll) are the least significant 7 bits. (mmmmmm) are the
>> most significant 7 bits."
>>
>>
>> >________________________________
>> > From: Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>
>> >To: Giulio Moro <giuliomoro at yahoo.it>
>> >Cc: "pd-list at lists.iem.at" <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
>> >Sent: Sunday, 4 September 2016, 19:33
>> >Subject: Re: [PD] bendin bug (?)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >2016-09-04 13:35 GMT-03:00 Giulio Moro <giuliomoro at yahoo.it>:
>> >
>> >Is this a [bendin] or a [bendout]  bug?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>[bendin]'s current implementation is closer to the actual MIDI messages
>> being transmitted.
>> >
>> >
>> >but in actuality, the not raw standard is from -8192 to 8191 right?
>> >
>> >
>> >I just care they both are the same, but it seems to me that -8192 to
>> 8191 is the sensible choice
>> >
>> >
>> >cheers
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/li
>> stinfo/pd-list
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160905/ac3e507a/attachment.html>