[PD] bendin bug (?)

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Mon Sep 12 20:28:45 CEST 2016


or might also be a valid point of view, I'm in favor of fixing inconsistent
things like this even if it means going through a lot of hassle fixing my
patches - but william huston proposed this backwards compatibility flag,
which is a neat solution

cheers

2016-09-12 9:22 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>:

> On 2016-09-12 11:25, Derek Kwan wrote:
> > i think it'd be fine to outright change one and
> > break backwards compat
>
> that's most likely because you don't have accumulated a lot of patches
> that rely on the old behaviour.
>
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20160912/6987f0fd/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list