[PD] problem with send~ instead of patchcord

[Miller Puckette]

The same possible one-tick delay happens with throw~/catch.  There's no
way around such a delay when the reading object comes before the writing one -
it's a fundamental limitation of digital signal processing.

Pd ought to offer a better way to force order of execution than the ones that
are available, but that's an ongoing question for me :)

Miller


On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:58:33PM +0200, oliver wrote:
> jlistshit wrote:
> > Use throw~ and catch~ instead of send~ and receive~.
> 
> hi,
> 
> sorry, not possible. only one catch~ for multiple throw~ objects
> 
> i need it the other way round ...
> 
> 
> btw: is there a technical difference between send~ and throw~ ?
> 
> 
> 
> thanks anyway
> 
> oliver
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list