[PD] Proposing a cyclone update / another Pre Alpha release (milestone 2)

Matt Barber brbrofsvl at gmail.com
Tue Oct 4 15:16:00 CEST 2016

Sorry, I meant we only needed to #include "m_pd.h" as usual.

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:46 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:

> On 2016-10-04 04:44, Matt Barber wrote:
> > I don't think we need a copy of it. We just need to include an existing
> > one, preferably from current vanilla.
> how do you include without copying?
> what is "current"? Pd-0.47-1? Pd-0.48-3?
> please do not include verbatim copies of *any* Pd-headers in your
> project. this is just bound to break sooner or later, making it even
> harder to fix.
> the Pd headers really must match the Pd binary running on the system
> where you compile. since the Pd binary is upgraded outside of your
> project, so should the headers.
> also, on w32 you need the corresponding pd.lib/pd.dll to properly link.
> (and if you decide to ship that as well, you could just ship the entire
> Pd; or just ship properly compiled binaries of your external).
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20161004/762bc1ba/attachment.html>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list