[PD] Purr Data beta 2

IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Sun Oct 9 23:20:17 CEST 2016

On 10/09/2016 11:09 PM, Matt Barber wrote:
> Thanks for this, IOhannes. We've been using macports for most of the
> development of purr-data on OSX (with a couple of fink installs for some
> libraries). Do you find brew to be superior, or was this a comfortable
> default?

i cannot really remember what led to the actual decision.
maybe brew was just the cool kid when i looked into it...

however, i'm under the impression that so far i have had far less
troubles with brew than with fink and or macports.
keep in mind, that i hardly ever use any of these in real live.
(so while i probably find brew to be superior, i have virtually zero
data points to be able to defend this position).


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20161009/98677e57/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list