[PD] [delwrite~], or "what Pd operations are/should be realtime?"

Jonathan Wilkes jancsika at yahoo.com
Thu Nov 24 17:41:42 CET 2016


> wouldn’t memset be faster?



No.  But only because compilers are smart enough to spot 
artisinally-rolled, prematurely unoptimized code and just 
use memset instead.
-Jonathan

> On 24 Nov 2016, at 10:41, Orm Finnendahl <orm.finnendahl at selma.hfmdk-frankfurt.de> wrote:
> 
> Am Mittwoch, den 23. November 2016 um 21:28:52 Uhr (-0200) schrieb Alexandre Torres Porres:
>> please show us (and miller) what it is about :)
> 
> patch against vanilla pd is attached. Also a small usage example.
> 
> Although it's trivial, adding it to pd would be quite useful for me
> especially since it doesn't break any backwards compatibility. In
> rehearsals of pieces with long delays/reverbs it's a real time-saver
> ;-)
> 
> --
> Orm
> <d_delay.patch><delwrite~-clear-example.pd>_______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


_______________________________________________
Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20161124/97f69638/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list