[PD] abstractions and dynamic patching

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Wed Dec 21 17:38:23 CET 2016


nice, several options, haha

2016-12-20 22:45 GMT-02:00 Christof Ressi <christof.ressi at gmx.at>:

> or make a subpatch named something like [pd $0-subpatch] inside your
> abstraction and place your tables there. this is what I usually do.
>
> Christof
>
>
>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2016 um 00:53 Uhr
> Von: "Alexandre Torres Porres" <porres at gmail.com>
> An: "pd-list at lists.iem.at" <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
> Betreff: Re: [PD] abstractions and dynamic patching
>
> [namecanvas] seem to do the trick ;)
>
> 2016-12-20 21:10 GMT-02:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com
> [mailto:porres at gmail.com]>:
> so, working on a buffer~ abstraction, it loads several [table] objects
> with dynamic patching, up to 64 channels, according to arguments that
> specify buffer name and number of channels. Now, if I create a 2nd buffer~
> abstraction and create more table objects, they do get also created in the
> first abstraction. This happens because inside each abstraction, when I
> send messages to the pd file, it communicates with all instances of the
> abstraction. Is there a way to interact with only one instance with dynamic
> patching???
> thanks_______________________________________________ Pd-list at lists.iem.at
> mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list[https://
> lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list]
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20161221/1549513e/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list