[PD] Rotary controllers for finetuning data?

[Esa Ruoho]

my head is completely fried now. i think this is the fourth thing i tried,
and now i got it to work. ouch. looks like a total shambles. but it works.
http://imgur.com/a/ZhWWS

not sure i can look at that image i linked, and what you suggested, and
make sense of it.. gotta crash.
i guess there's a better way of doing this shambles?


On 10 January 2017 at 23:54, Claude Heiland-Allen <claude at mathr.co.uk>
wrote:

> On 10/01/17 21:31, Esa Ruoho wrote:
> > Any ideas how to go about it?
>
> The [value] object will likely help you, along with [select] and
> [trigger] (which can be abbreviated to [v], [sel] and [t]).  Remember to
> use $0 in the name of the [v], if you want multiple instances of your
> patch or abstraction to be independent.
>
> A pattern you might find useful is:
>
> control message
>  |
> [t b      a]
>  |        |
> [value x] |
>  |        |
> some process
>  |
> [t b f]
>  | /
> [value x]
>  |
> updated value
>
>
> Claude
> --
> https://mathr.co.uk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
>



-- 
---
http://twitter.com/esaruoho // http://lackluster.bandcamp.com // +358403703659
//
skype:esajuhaniruoho // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/ // iMessage:
esaruoho at gmail.com //
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170111/65d9e5b1/attachment.html>