[PD] test audio signals: Are there <~ and >~ objects?

[Giulio Moro]

A solution is available in Enzien's heavylib https://github.com/enzienaudio/heavylib , it involves some [min] and [clip -1e-37 0] . No [expr~], so it is also fully heavy-compatible (as you would expect).Giulio

      From: cyrille henry <ch at chnry.net>
 To: pd-list at lists.iem.at 
 Sent: Monday, 6 February 2017, 13:11
 Subject: Re: [PD] test audio signals: Are there <~ and >~ objects?
   


Le 06/02/2017 à 14:00, Peter P. a écrit :
>
> * IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> [2017-02-06 07:45]:
>> On 2017-02-06 13:34, Peter P. wrote:
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> this seems to be easy but I can't figure it out:
>>>
>>> How can I test an audio signal to lie within a certain range, or just if
>>> it is bigger or smaller than a reference value, and receive the result
>>> as an audio signal as well? Are there <~ an >~ objects or equivalents?
>>
>>
>> - [expr~ $v1>0.5]
>> - zexy's [>~]
>> - iirc cyclone provides them too
> Thanks IOhannes and Roman! Funny there are no internal objects for this.
for a vanilla only solution, you can use tabread~ with a 2 point table...
cheers
C


> best, P
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>

_______________________________________________
Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170206/b6d279f2/attachment-0001.html>