[PD] test audio signals: Are there <~ and >~ objects?

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

yeah, it's confusing, but it's just "more" stuff into the vanilla package

2017-02-06 15:18 GMT-02:00 Giulio Moro <giuliomoro at yahoo.it>:

> > I don't know why [expr~] is usually not considered vanilla
>
> Maybe because it lives in extra/ instead of src/ ?
>
> What is extra/ there for, by the way? I remember it being mentioned in
> msp's paper that introduced [pd~], but not sure why it is still there.
> Giulio
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>
> To: "pd-list at lists.iem.at" <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
> Sent: Monday, 6 February 2017, 17:13
> Subject: Re: [PD] test audio signals: Are there <~ and >~ objects?
>
>
> 2017-02-06 11:00 GMT-02:00 Peter P. <peterparker at fastmail.com>:
> Thanks IOhannes and Roman! Funny there are no internal objects for this.
> >best, P
> >
>
> [expr~] is an internal
>
> 2017-02-06 11:11 GMT-02:00 cyrille henry <ch at chnry.net>:
> for a vanilla only solution, you can use tabread~ with a 2 point table...
> >
>
> I don't know why [expr~] is usually not considered vanilla
>
> the vanilla solution is with [expr~], which is an internal in vanilla
>
>
> cheers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170206/64400648/attachment.html>