[PD] test audio signals: Are there <~ and >~ objects?

[Peter P.]

* IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> [2017-02-06 16:24]:
> On 02/06/2017 10:03 PM, Matt Barber wrote:
> > These are probably more efficient than expr~
> 
> speaking of performance: zexy's binops should definitely be fastest (as
> they are actively optimized).
> 
> but as christoph said: these objects are most likely not the performance
> bottle-necks of your
> 
> anyhow, here's another trick i learned from miller, to emulate "> 0.2"
> for signals:
> 
> [-+ 0.2]
> |
> [*~ 1e10]
> |
> [clip~ 0 1]

This is a nice one! Thanks IO and Miller! Made a "< 0.2" version as
well:

[sig~ 0.2]  [inlet~]
|          /
|   ______/
|  /
[-~]
|
[*~ 1e10]
|
[clip 0 1]