[PD] purr-data installation on linux(ubuntu 16.04)

oscar santis pelaosantis at gmail.com
Wed Feb 15 13:36:12 CET 2017


Try with PPA
https://launchpad.net/~dr-graef/+archive/ubuntu/pd-l2ork.xenial
Best

Óscar Santis
escultor, pintor, músico ruidista
http://www.oscarsantis.com
+56 9 75802965

El 15/02/2017 07:36, <pd-list-request at lists.iem.at> escribió:

Send Pd-list mailing list submissions to
        pd-list at lists.iem.at

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        pd-list-request at lists.iem.at

You can reach the person managing the list at
        pd-list-owner at lists.iem.at

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Pd-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. purr-data installation on linux(ubuntu 16.04) (Jonghyun Kim)
   2. Re: pd from git coredumps on ubuntu 16.10 (alex tuca)
   3. Re: cross platforms issues with displaying fonts in vanilla
      but not in Purr Data (Roman Haefeli)
   4. Re: cross platforms issues with displaying fonts in vanilla
      but not in Purr Data (Roman Haefeli)
   5. Re: pd from git coredumps on ubuntu 16.10 (alex tuca)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:08:48 +0900
From: Jonghyun Kim <agitato816 at gmail.com>
To: "pd-list at lists.iem.at" <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
Subject: [PD] purr-data installation on linux(ubuntu 16.04)
Message-ID:
        <CAC8jf9eS9hNeWSY6iq-qj51mw-sw5ySP7CYN-Xp-RONVm-DBMA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi list,

I've got an error installing purr-data on ubuntu 16.04.

$ sudo gdebi pd-l2ork-2.0-ubuntu_16.04-x86_64.deb
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
*This package is uninstallable*
*A later version is already installed*
$

FYI, I have already installed:
pd-l2ork 20160614

I tried purr-data from this site:
https://git.purrdata.net/jwilkes/purr-data-binaries/tree/master

How to solve it?

Thanks,
akntk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/
20170215/a87b525d/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 09:51:19 +0100
From: alex tuca <atuc at gmx.de>
To: pd-list at lists.iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] pd from git coredumps on ubuntu 16.10
Message-ID: <98fe7dbc-14f3-785d-0500-23795a3262a9 at gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

i use jack with qjackctl, started with d-bus, jackd version is:
jackdmp 1.9.11

i have no problems with other jack programs, ardour, mpv everthing works
fine,



On 15.02.2017 00:22, zmoelnig at iem.at wrote:
> On 02/14/2017 09:42 PM, alex tuca wrote:
>> with debug option,
> [...]
>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>> (gdb) backtrace
>> #0  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>> #1  0x000055555562e9ed in jack_open_audio (inchans=2, outchans=2,
rate=44100, callback=0x0) at s_audio_jack.c:349
>> #2  0x00005555555e19eb in sys_reopen_audio () at s_audio.c:456
>> #3  0x00005555555e8bdc in sys_main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffdfa8) at
s_main.c:319
>> #4  0x00005555555e3110 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffdfa8) at
s_entry.c:32
>> (gdb)
>>
>
> it's JACK that is crashing (taken Pd with it).
>
>
> which jackd are you using?
> against which libjack are you compiling/linking?

how can i find out this? when i do ldd on pd, i get only this libs?

ldd /usr/local/bin/pd
        linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007ffd981da000)
        libasound.so.2 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasound.so.2
(0x00007f2a800bf000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
(0x00007f2a7fea1000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f2a7fc9d000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f2a7f994000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f2a7f5cd000)
        librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007f2a7f3c3000)
        /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00005611dabd4000)


> is jack running? do other jack-applications work as expected?
>
> gasnrd
> IOhannes
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
listinfo/pd-list
>




------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:05:27 +0100
From: Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>
To: pd-list at lists.iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] cross platforms issues with displaying fonts in
        vanilla but not in Purr Data
Message-ID: <1487153127.1907.42.camel at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hey all

I'm happy that so many people are trying to tackling the font / box
size issue in vanilla now. From what I can tell, box sizes aren't even
consistent within the same Linux distribution. When I switched from
Ubuntu 14.04 to 16.04, boxes grew horizontally by one pixel per
character for patches with fontsize=10. From what I can tell, other
font sizes haven't been affected (no change). Unfortunately, font size
10 is the one that I usually use for my patches.

And it's not only a visual defect. Symbolboxes suddenly don't fit into
the GOP area anymore and thus are not displayed at all on the parent.
Functionality of patches is truly harmed by this issue.

I never managed to get a deeper understanding of the problem and I
decided as a temporary work-around to manually fix the line for font
size 10 in font metrics in pd-gui.tcl whenever I update Pd. Somehow I
concluded back then that this is not a definitive solution, since my
modification failed to make box sizes consistent between Linux and
Windows.


On Die, 2017-02-14 at 22:46 +0000, Lucas Cordiviola wrote:
> Did you read my messages?

Yes, but I can't keep track of all of them.

> I need your results on All OS.
>
> Download:
>
>
> http://lucarda.com.ar/x/pd-gui.zip
>
>
> extract “pd-gui.tcl” and overwrite your existing one on the Tcl
> folder.

Done.

> Give us screen-shots on All Oss.

Of what? Is there a test patch to use for the screenshot? I guess it
would make the most sense if all participants in this survey would use
the same patch.

I can tell so much yet: Your pd-gui.tcl makes boxes use the "correct"
width (no overlapping in GOP) with fontsize=10. However, box height is
2px smaller compared to what I had in Ubuntu 14.04 and what I currently
have in Windows 10 (this is without DVSM, but with Courier in Windows).

I'd be really glad if this is going to be fixed.

Roman



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/
20170215/d326e06e/attachment-0001.sig>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:28:14 +0100
From: Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>
To: pd-list at lists.iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] cross platforms issues with displaying fonts in
        vanilla but not in Purr Data
Message-ID: <1487154494.1907.46.camel at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Mit, 2017-02-15 at 11:05 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> On Die, 2017-02-14 at 22:46 +0000, Lucas Cordiviola wrote:
> >
> > extract “pd-gui.tcl” and overwrite your existing one on the Tcl
> > folder.
> Done.
>
> I can tell so much yet: Your pd-gui.tcl makes boxes use the "correct"
> width (no overlapping in GOP) with fontsize=10. However, box height
> is
> 2px smaller compared to what I had in Ubuntu 14.04 and what I
> currently
> have in Windows 10 (this is without DVSM, but with Courier in
> Windows).


Report for Windows 10: It doesn't change anything, boxes still have the
same height and width for fontsize 10.

Conclusion: Your pd-gui.tcl fixes fontsize=10 on Ubuntu 16.04 without
negative effect on Windows. Already a huge improvement.

Roman

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/
20170215/8142f9ca/attachment-0001.sig>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:35:09 +0100
From: alex tuca <atuc at gmx.de>
To: pd-list at lists.iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] pd from git coredumps on ubuntu 16.10
Message-ID: <7afb852e-6a61-00a1-998c-fd04f56b628f at gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

i just tested my old saved pd version with this hash,

git rev-parse HEAD
3e1a3f2e4b83c224fc988239d8af272e3e27bd87

this works without core dump



On 15.02.2017 00:22, zmoelnig at iem.at wrote:
> On 02/14/2017 09:42 PM, alex tuca wrote:
>> with debug option,
> [...]
>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>> (gdb) backtrace
>> #0  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>> #1  0x000055555562e9ed in jack_open_audio (inchans=2, outchans=2,
rate=44100, callback=0x0) at s_audio_jack.c:349
>> #2  0x00005555555e19eb in sys_reopen_audio () at s_audio.c:456
>> #3  0x00005555555e8bdc in sys_main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffdfa8) at
s_main.c:319
>> #4  0x00005555555e3110 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffdfa8) at
s_entry.c:32
>> (gdb)
>>
>
> it's JACK that is crashing (taken Pd with it).
>
>
> which jackd are you using?
> against which libjack are you compiling/linking?
> is jack running? do other jack-applications work as expected?
>
> gasnrd
> IOhannes
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
listinfo/pd-list
>




------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Pd-list mailing list
Pd-list at lists.iem.at
to manage your subscription (including un-subscription) see
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


------------------------------

End of Pd-list Digest, Vol 143, Issue 95
****************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170215/8e7ef1c7/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list