[PD] Question about loadbang and dynamic sub-patches

[David]

Hi!

I have a question about the expected behaviour of loadbang when it's used
in a sub-patch that's built dynamically. It appears that it isn't getting
triggered. I've attached a simplified example.

Should it get triggered? Does anyone know of a workaround for this? In
other words, something that's functionally equivalent? I want certain
events to happen once when I build a sub-patch dynamically, to initialize
some objects. I guess I could use creation arguments to do that, but I'd
rather not have to do that.

Thanks,
David.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170216/ca53b51d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: loadbang-test.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 143 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170216/ca53b51d/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 201 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170216/ca53b51d/attachment-0001.obj>