[PD] Question about loadbang and dynamic sub-patches

David dfkettle at gmail.com
Thu Feb 16 20:09:48 CET 2017

Thanks, works perfectly!


On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Christof Ressi <christof.ressi at gmx.at>

> [loadbang] doesn't fire in dynamically created patches.
> The easiest workaround: use [iemguts/initbang].
> Christof
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2017 um 17:18 Uhr
> Von: David <dfkettle at gmail.com>
> An: Pd-List <pd-list at lists.iem.at>
> Betreff: [PD] Question about loadbang and dynamic sub-patches
> Hi!
> I have a question about the expected behaviour of loadbang when it's used
> in a sub-patch that's built dynamically. It appears that it isn't getting
> triggered. I've attached a simplified example.
> Should it get triggered? Does anyone know of a workaround for this? In
> other words, something that's functionally equivalent? I want certain
> events to happen once when I build a sub-patch dynamically, to initialize
> some objects. I guess I could use creation arguments to do that, but I'd
> rather not have to do that.
> Thanks,
> David.
>  _______________________________________________ Pd-list at lists.iem.at
> mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170216/26c0c4d2/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list