[PD] Question about loadbang and dynamic sub-patches

[zmoelnig at iem.at]

On 02/17/2017 02:25 AM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> FWIW in pd-l2ork/purr-data loadbang fires even in dynamically created
> patches. 

so does that mean, that if i have an abstraction "foo":

[loadbang]
|
[f 1]
|
[outlet]

and i dynamically create a patch including that abstraction, the
loadbang will be lost on the created patch?
(meaning: the following will not print:
 #X obj 100 100 foo;
 #X obj 100 200 print;
 #X connect 0 0 1 0;
)

if it does print, i would be interested in the heuristic you used.

if it does indeed not print, then i think i just hit a bug (as the patch
behaves different when created dynamically or not¹)

gfmsrda
IOhannes

¹ it doesnt't in Pd vanilla, if you don't forget to send a "loadbang"
message after doing the dynamic patching as a kind of "finalize".

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170217/1dd4e4cc/attachment.sig>