[PD] pduino/firmata trouble? (Rick Snow)

Björn Eriksson miulew at gmail.com
Thu Feb 23 15:32:13 CET 2017


Thanks for this hopeful reply!
I will be following up with some specific problems regarding the Pduino /
Firmata I encountered.
To put it short it seems to me that things works much better with the older
Firmata v2.1 than the newer ones.
Among some problems were problems to setup I/O digital pins from within
Pd-patch.
But as said, I will return with some specifics within a week or two.

The Pduino version you did Roman, with less dependencies, was that released
the ordinary ways - and might it even be searchable through Deken?  If
so... what to look for?

All the best,
Björn Eriksson

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Son, 2017-02-19 at 12:27 +0100, Björn Eriksson wrote:
> > Hello list!
> > I experience also problems coming now and then whith different
> > firmata together with pduino.
> > Are there by chance any updated info on this, on how to have the
> > latest pduino communicate at it´s best with what Firmata somewhere?
>
> I once made a pduino version that uses less dependencies. I consider it
> well tested with Firmata v2.2 and v2.3. I see that the current arduino
> IDE (1.8.1) ships with Firmata protocol version 2.5.1.
>
> I didn't track the changes since 2.3. However, I'm willing to fix
> pduino if there is some indication that pduino is not compatible with
> more recent Firmatas.
>
> Please be as specific as possible in reporting what's not working for
> you.
>
> Roman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170223/b6884b07/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list