[PD] Cross-platform uniform GUI rendering of patches.

Esteban Viveros emviveros at gmail.com
Fri Feb 24 18:09:45 CET 2017


Like pd user, I experienced bold in object boxes looks great, but in
documentation, help files simply looks terrible for reading and for
posterior learning.. :/

I'm came from pd  linux -> windows -> (and finally) OSx, and for me it was
always a relief to read the documentation in OSx, something I only can
really understand with this discussion.

my one cent.. :)

Cheers
Esteban

Em sex, 24 de fev de 2017 às 11:50, Alexandre Torres Porres <
porres at gmail.com> escreveu:

> just realized that even stuff like GUI's labels become bold, yikes... that
> kinda compromises the design of some abstraction patches I have that use
> them.
>
> 2017-02-24 4:16 GMT-03:00 Derek Kwan <derek.x.kwan at gmail.com>:
>
> > maybe makes sense to show a normal weight version of the patch for
> > comparison...
> >
> > quite less poluted if you ask me, and it's not like I cannot read the
> patch
> > as well for not being bold too...
>
> > >> I don't really have a strong point, at the same time I also do not
> > >> think that one is much worse than the other.
> > >>
>
> I think the comments look better with the regular font but I think it's
> fine to have the objects as bold. Esp with diff weights of fonts, it's
> easier to pick out the objects at a quick glance. I think that could be
> particularly helpful since Pd vanilla (at least without any tcl plugins)
> doesn't distinguish objects from the rest of the other things on the
> canvas with different colors or fills.
>
> Derek
>
> --
> Derek Kwan
> www.derekxkwan.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170224/06920f5d/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list