[PD] soundfiler alternative?

[Roman Haefeli]

On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 18:06 +0000, José Rafael Subía Valdez wrote:
> Thank you Lucas and Ingo,
> 
> well. I do need to load a lot of samples if I want them preloaded.
> Regarding the ram post that you sent, as I understand, that is
> exactly what table does, as it stores it in RAM (am I right?)
> 
> Ingo, if I understand correclty, I need to record the audio from
> readsf~ into a table. this means that I need to create the record
> system to avoid clicks (fades in and out). This seams overcomplicated
> for a simple thing. But it appears to be the only solution for this
> problem.
> 
> thanks .. anyone else?


I missed Ingo's mail and it's apparently also not in the list archive.
Probably he responded privately.

Anyway, Miller proposed once a solution with [readsf~], too. The idea
was to put it into a re-blocked and upsampled subpatch, so that it
would read the file much quicker than real time, but slow enough not to
cause dropouts. It's a bit more complicated to program than simply
sending a message to [soundfiler], but still easy to do. And you need
to figure out what is a good upsampling ratio.

Roman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170227/432a7382/attachment.sig>