[PD] [bug?] loadbanging with "-noloadbang"

IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed May 10 20:47:51 CEST 2017

i just discovered, that a [loadbang] can trigger even if Pd is started
with "-noloadbang".

1.) create an abstraction myloadbang.pd
[print $0-loadbanged]

2.) create a patch that contains (only) a [myloadbang] object, save it
as "myloadbang-test.pd"

3.) start Pd with "pd -noloadbang myloadbang-test.pd"

3a.) observe that the loadbang is suppressed (as there is no
"1004-loadbanged: bang" printout)

4.) in the myloadbang-test.pd patch, create a new instance of [myloadbang].

4a) observe that the instance does get loadbanged (the Pd-console shows
"1005-loadbanged: bang")

is this intended behaviour? (I don't have a string opinion either way;
but i wonder...).


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170510/91ff3be2/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list