[PD] [bug?] loadbanging with "-noloadbang"

[IOhannes m zmölnig]

On 05/10/2017 09:20 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
> I never thought about it - my original intent in -noloadbang was to allow one
> to open a patch that might be crashing Pd somehow because of a loadbang
> action (such as a batch process that automatically exits after a fixed time).

right. that's what i think as well; and that's why i also don't know
whether it's a bug or not.

> 
> I'm not sure what the correct behavior should be.
> 

however: the behaviour did change between 0.46 and 0.47.
older versions of Pd would *never* automatically emit a loadbang if the
"-noloadbang" flag was given.

gmdsar
IOhannes


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170510/9ea01a9a/attachment.sig>