[PD] HOA / spatialization approaches for a hemisphere

Pierre Guillot guillotpierre6 at gmail.com
Sat Jun 24 11:26:59 CEST 2017


Hi Jesse,

With Ambisonics, ideally your loudspeakers should discretize perfectly a
sphere, you should have your head at the exact center of this sphere, etc.
and perhaps if you forget that your head interferes and the loudspeakers
don't generate plane waves you'll be able to reconstruct a coherent sound
field... But to avoid these restrictions (because very few people have a
full sphere of loudspeakers - or want to ask the audience to be completely
crushed at the center of the sphere) there are several techniques :
optimizations of the energy and/or velocity vectors, optimizations of the
decoding, etc. The problem is that none of the solutions are completely
generic. Your choice must be driven by your approach and your goal.The
advantage of Ambisonics lies in its intermediary representation of the
sound field that allows to apply transformations (rotation or whatever) and
to decode for different loudspeakers configurations. But if you just want
to spatialize individuals point sources, you can also use VBAP that is
perhaps much more accessible. Nevertheless yes, you can surely find a way
to decode the sound field for two ring of loudspeakers with Ambisonics (we
can discuss it if you want). And one good rule is just to avoid placing
sources where the loudspeakers are missing. I don't know if I really answer
the question, I hope a bit :)

Cheers,

Pierre

> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:19:29 -0600
> From: jmejia at anestheticaudio.com
> To: pd-list at lists.iem.at
> Subject: [PD] HOA / spatialization approaches for a hemisphere
> Message-ID: <3149263781acf8439b762eef943d60e5 at anestheticaudio.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi List,
>
> I'm putting together a 32 channel HDLA and looking for spatialization
> advice. The configuration will be two rings, one higher than the other,
> and I've been thinking a bit smaller/closer to approximate a hemisphere.
> But that's flexible - they could be parallel rings if it simplifies
> things.
>
> I have some (limited) experience using HoaLibrary + PD for 2D ambisonics
> - so my initial thought was to try the 3d externals there - however I'm
> not sure if it actually makes sense to build an abstraction setup for a
> sphere of twice as many channels while limiting access to the upper
> hemisphere only. I'm assuming there would be some problems with that
> approach.
>
> I found a few papers on mixed-order ambisonics - by Chris Travis and
> also the AmbiX crew - but I'm not sure if there's away to implement that
> stuff with HoaLibrary. I'm also open to using different software if
> something else is recommended instead.
>
> Thanks for any advice!
>
> -Jesse
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170624/f718b00d/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list