[PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.48-0test1 released

Miller Puckette msp at ucsd.edu
Sun Jul 16 18:45:43 CEST 2017


That's just the question - is it worth keeping an old bug available for
compatibility?   In this case, perhaps yes - although you'd have to
explicitly set a compatibility flag in Pd to get eh old behavior.

(incidentally teh old behavior was machine-dependent - this complicates it
even further :)

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 01:41:22PM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> 2017-07-16 13:03 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list <pd-list at lists.iem.at
> >:
> 
> > Hi Miller,
> >
> > Should there be a compatibility path for the following bugfix:
> >
> > https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/pure-data/ci/
> > fc1dd9b0d93e9b039719103155b5772f20762c7e/
> >
> > Looks like the old behavior was there for awhile.
> >
> 
> hmm, more than a "behaviour", seems to me like a wrong mathematical output,
> a bug.

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




More information about the Pd-list mailing list