[PD] Pd 0.48.0test1: donecanvasdialog changed?

[Miller Puckette]

Well, the change fixes a very annoying bug... perhaps I can fix it so that
there's an extra version argument to the message (version 0, teh default,
would be the old behavior; version 1 would be the new)

cheers
Miller

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:17:44AM +0200, oliver wrote:
> Christof Ressi wrote:
> >yeah, changing the 2 to 3 always works but the remaining problem is:
> >what about all those patches which have a '2' in the
> >[donecanvasdialog( message? I know, dynamic patching is not
> >'officially' supported but it's a very common practice with whole
> >libraries relying on it.
> >
> 
> yes, i can also confirm, that all my (resizable) GOP abstractions are broken
> due to this new behaviour. (changing all patches from 2 to 3 would work
> though, and yes it would be "backwards-compatible")
> 
> i really like to confirm christofs request to change this back to old
> behaviour. sharing patches or studying patches from archives will be a pain
> if they used the donecanvasdialog method.
> 
> best
> 
> oliver
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list