[PD] Pd 0.48.0test1: donecanvasdialog changed?

[Christof Ressi]

Sounds great :-)

> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Juli 2017 um 20:25 Uhr
> Von: "Miller Puckette" <msp at ucsd.edu>
> An: oliver <oliver at klingt.org>
> Cc: "Pd list" <pd-list at mail.iem.at>
> Betreff: Re: [PD] Pd 0.48.0test1: donecanvasdialog changed?
>
> Well, the change fixes a very annoying bug... perhaps I can fix it so that
> there's an extra version argument to the message (version 0, teh default,
> would be the old behavior; version 1 would be the new)
> 
> cheers
> Miller
> 
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:17:44AM +0200, oliver wrote:
> > Christof Ressi wrote:
> > >yeah, changing the 2 to 3 always works but the remaining problem is:
> > >what about all those patches which have a '2' in the
> > >[donecanvasdialog( message? I know, dynamic patching is not
> > >'officially' supported but it's a very common practice with whole
> > >libraries relying on it.
> > >
> > 
> > yes, i can also confirm, that all my (resizable) GOP abstractions are broken
> > due to this new behaviour. (changing all patches from 2 to 3 would work
> > though, and yes it would be "backwards-compatible")
> > 
> > i really like to confirm christofs request to change this back to old
> > behaviour. sharing patches or studying patches from archives will be a pain
> > if they used the donecanvasdialog method.
> > 
> > best
> > 
> > oliver
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>