[PD] Writing part of large table to file

[hrvojeradnic at yahoo.com]

What I hear is not the part I wanted to save ie I need the part from the end of a table, getting the part from the beginning instead. And it is shorter. 
I can't find the pattern in that offset, so can't describe the bug precisely. 

Poslano s mojeg iPhonea

01.08.2017., u 13:24, Lucas Cordiviola <lucarda27 at hotmail.com> napisao:

> I'm on win8.1
> 
> Do you clear the array when loading files that are smaller than the one you loaded previously?
> 
> Can you describe what is that you are hearing that makes you feel there's a bug?
> Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
>> On 8/1/2017 8:13 AM, Hrvoje Radnic wrote:
>> Yes, the playback part [readsf~] is bad, but that was not an issue. I made a mistake with pasting the part from my patch. 
>> Regarding the soundfiler, I still have no clue what is wrong with my patch. Maybe the problem is OS specific? I can't test it on my Win machine right now. What's your OS? I am on ubuntu sudio. 
>> Cheers!
>> 
>>  
>> Hrvoje Radnic
>> http://soundcloud.com/sumovi-protiv-valova 
>> 00385(0)915225162
>> 
>> 
>> From: Lucas Cordiviola <lucarda27 at hotmail.com>
>> To: Hrvoje Radnic <hrvojeradnic at yahoo.com>; "pd-list at lists.iem.at" <pd-list at lists.iem.at> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 12:21 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PD] Writing part of large table to file
>> 
>> I've corrected the [readsf~] but the rest is OK.
>> Didn't have troubles with -nframes > 1.8M. Works Ok with 2.5M.
>> The only limitation that I know for integer numbers (on Pd's control level) is that you can't exceed the 16777216 number.
>> See attached.
>> Salutti,
>> Lucarda.
>> Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
>>> On 8/1/2017 6:10 AM, Hrvoje Radnic wrote:
>>> Sure, it is in the attachment.
>>> Thank you for your time!
>>>  
>>> Hrvoje Radnic
>>> http://soundcloud.com/sumovi-protiv-valova 
>>> 00385(0)915225162
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: Lucas Cordiviola <lucarda27 at hotmail.com>
>>> To: "pd-list at lists.iem.at" <pd-list at lists.iem.at> 
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 12:09 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [PD] Writing part of large table to file
>>> 
>>> Can you attach a patch that demonstrate the issue?
>>> Do not attach the sound-file, we fill your specified n of samples.
>>> Salutti,
>>> Lucarda.
>>> Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
>>>> On 7/31/2017 6:31 AM, Hrvoje Radnic via Pd-list wrote:
>>>> Ok, I got some success with soundfiler, but,  found out that I can write a file only if the last sample of the file is smaller than 1 800 000 approximately (-nframes flag). Anyone had similar experience? Is it a bug?
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>  
>>>> Hrvoje Radnic
>>>> http://soundcloud.com/sumovi-protiv-valova 
>>>> 00385(0)915225162
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> From: Jack <jack at rybn.org>
>>>> To: pd-list at lists.iem.at 
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 10:13 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [PD] Writing part of large table to file
>>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> Did you see the help file about [soundfiler] to save a table in binary
>>>> sound file ?
>>>> It is easy to copy/paste a part of table with objects [array].
>>>> ++
>>>> 
>>>> Jack
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Le 30/07/2017 à 12:14, Hrvoje Radnic via Pd-list a écrit :
>>>> > Dear List!
>>>> > 
>>>> > I would like to save a part of very large table into the audio file.
>>>> > Let's say, I have a 10 million points sized table and want to save a
>>>> > file to disk which contains the part of that table, ranging from 2M to
>>>> > 3M point. I know how to do it by recording the audio in real time, but
>>>> > would like to do it "instantly". 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Thank you for your suggestions!
>>>> >  
>>>> > Hrvoje Radnic
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170801/c9df85d4/attachment-0001.html>