[PD] going from signals to events?
batchku at gmail.com
Sun Sep 3 17:52:59 CEST 2017
Thanks everyone, super helpful.
@peter: it seems to me that `max~` and `min~` take signals in and put
signals out. How would you use them to go from signal to event?
@liam: yes! `threshold~` is what i was looking for; i'm always up for
doing the extra work to stick with vanilla.
@claude: deep. i'll look at the expr~ example, very helpful reference.
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Claude Heiland-Allen <claude at mathr.co.uk>
> Hi Ali,
> On 2017-09-03 15:36, Ali Momeni wrote:
>> what are your favorite objects for going from signals to events?
>> specifically, i'd like to make a sample accurate / audio-driven
> Note that signal-to-event in Pd's architecture necessarily means the
> events occur up to 1 DSP block later than intended, and possibly not
> scheduled on Pd's logical clock (I haven't checked the source of eg
> [threshold~] to see if it schedules with constant 1-block latency vs
> variable as-soon-as-possible on the next block boundary latency, but I
> suspect the latter). So you'll get late events with up to 1.5ms jitter,
> with default settings.
> If you want a sample-accurate audio-driven sequencer, you really need to
> keep everything in the signal domain. See for example the 0xA expr~
> tutorials at https://archive.bleu255.com/0xA/
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/li
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list