[PD] going from signals to events?

[Ali Momeni]

Agreed on all fronts.

The reason i'm keen on having a master clock that's audio driven is because
i also want to sync my step sequencer to looping audio buffers, playback
with a phasor~

I see that this could also be done with with metro (i.e. trigger playback
of the audio file)

On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Matt Davey <hard.off at gmail.com> wrote:

> performance, as in CPU performance?  For sure you're gonna get much
> greater performance using just messages.
>
> It's also MUCH simpler to sequence with a [metro] and messages, and very
> easy to do interesting things to a sequence.
>
> compare that to something like this, in the link claude just shared:
>
> https://archive.bleu255.com/0xA/files/2016/04/010_shuffle.png
>
> what a mess!
>
>
> I see what you mean about having a single master clock, but why not just
> have a single master clock that's based on [metro] and a counter?  You can
> use that clock to trigger sub-clocks to whatever resolution you like, right
> down to subsample accuracy.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170903/3ab0f18b/attachment-0001.html>