[PD] responsability / privacy

[Jean-Marie Adrien]

thanks for contributions !
course there is no keyboard nor mouse, just a mini mac headless in a box.
point is that i have to guarantee somehow that no geek can twist things easily physically on the mac, 
even if the guy has a screwdriver, for instance to steal images via GEM or whatever
being no hacker myself :)
(you know, society is getting more and more paranoid…)
…
hmm


> Le 12 sept. 2017 à 14:31, Markus Brandt <2brandt63 at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> hi
> 
> if you could start your patch with pd -nogui flag, patches would no be visible, so afaik not to be editable
>  anymore.
> 
> cheers
> markus
> 
> 2017-09-12 14:25 GMT+02:00 Jean-Marie Adrien <jm.adrien.mnt at gmail.com <mailto:jm.adrien.mnt at gmail.com>>:
> Hello
> I will make an installation in a public space soon where the machine (mac) will be somehow accessible :
> for responsibility and privacy reasons, i’d like to make it impossible to manipulate the patches
> (first time i encounter this issue in my long usage of pd…)
> Is there a way to lock everything ? compile or whatever ?
> i mean once a patch is running, the mac is basically accessible, no ?
> (session opened, mouse and keyboard operable, not talking about ethernet)
> What i have been doing until now is run patches in public spaces tor theaters just as at home and that was fine, but won’t be ok this time
> Thanks
> JM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-list at lists.iem.at> mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list <https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20170912/7df673d2/attachment.html>