[PD] why not Purr Data?

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Sun Oct 1 20:02:45 CEST 2017


At the moment, Purr Data is not fully up to date with the latest Vanilla.
It also doesn't have support for many externals that can be loaded into
Vanilla. Vanilla is also pretty reliable.

cheers

2017-10-01 14:48 GMT-03:00 Ali Momeni <batchku at gmail.com>:

> Hello all,
>
> I've been playing around with the latest Purr Data from:
> https://agraef.github.io/purr-data/
>
> and, well, I love it.  The entire experience of working with Pd is much
> more pleasant.
>
> I'm compelled to ask the group, especially the Pd Vanilla users among us,
> the following simple question:
>
> What reason is there NOT to use Purr Data?
>
> Am I missing something?
> Subtle disadvantages?
> Missing functionality?
> Reliability?
> Performance?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> ali
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20171001/eae6616a/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list