[PD] why not Purr Data?
Alexandre Torres Porres
porres at gmail.com
Sun Oct 1 22:22:45 CEST 2017
you haven't replied to the pd list, so I'm bringing it back to the list.
Please don't reply directly just to me, keep this thread in the list ;)
2017-10-01 15:31 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>:
> 2017-10-01 15:04 GMT-03:00 Ali Momeni <batchku at gmail.com>:
>> By support for many externals that can be loaded into Vanilla, you mean
>> ones that have a GUI? or others too?
> Mostly GUI, and not just graphical objects, things like
> Moreover, there are some external libraries that were not provided for
> Extended but are now provided for Vanilla and not included in Purr Data,
> and some are not compatible too.
> There's also the case of a library being updated and available for
> Vanilla, but not on Purr Data yet. Like cyclone, which has new versions
> since early 2017 but hasn't made into Purr Data yet.
> There might be a notion that Vanilla is limited, and Purr Data or extended
> more complete. I challenge that notion.
> Oh, and if you're into libpd, that's also something that you need Vanilla
> And yeah, I say Purr Data is still less stable than Vanilla.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list