[PD] why not Purr Data?

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

you haven't replied to the pd list, so I'm bringing it back to the list.
Please don't reply directly just to me, keep this thread in the list ;)

2017-10-01 15:31 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com>:

>
>
> 2017-10-01 15:04 GMT-03:00 Ali Momeni <batchku at gmail.com>:
>>
>>
>> By support for many externals that can be loaded into Vanilla, you mean
>> ones that have a GUI?  or others too?
>>
>
> Mostly GUI, and not just graphical objects, things like
> [cyclone/MouseState].
>
> Moreover, there are some external libraries that were not provided for
> Extended but are now provided for Vanilla and not included in Purr Data,
> and some are not compatible too.
>
> There's also the case of a library being updated and available for
> Vanilla, but not on Purr Data yet. Like cyclone, which has new versions
> since early 2017 but hasn't made into Purr Data yet.
>
> There might be a notion that Vanilla is limited, and Purr Data or extended
> more complete. I challenge that notion.
>
> Oh, and if you're into libpd, that's also something that you need Vanilla
> for.
>
> And yeah, I say Purr Data is still less stable than Vanilla.
>
> cheers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20171001/4e6679d4/attachment.html>